Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF) is the problem of finding paths for a set of agents such that each agent reaches its desired destination while avoiding collisions with the other agents. Many MAPF solvers are designed to run offline, that is, first generate paths for all agents and then execute them. Real-Time MAPF (RT-MAPF) embodies a realistic MAPF setup in which one cannot wait until a complete path for each agent has been found before they start to move. Instead, planning and execution are interleaved, where the agents must commit to a fixed number of steps in a constant amount of computation time, referred to as the planning budget. Existing solutions to RT-MAPF iteratively call windowed versions of MAPF algorithms in every planning period, without explicitly considering the size of the planning budget. We address this gap and explore different policies for allocating the planning budget in windowed versions of standard MAPF algorithms, namely Prioritized Planning (PrP) and MAPF-LNS2. Our exploration shows that the baseline approach in which all agents draw from a shared planning budget pool is ineffective in over-constrained situations. Instead, policies that distribute the planning budget over the agents are able to solve more problems with a smaller makespan.

We explore the use of Artificial Potential Fields (APFs) to solve Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) and Lifelong MAPF (LMAPF) problems. In MAPF, a team of agents must move to their goal locations without collisions, whereas in LMAPF, new goals are generated upon arrival. We propose methods for incorporating APFs in a range of MAPF algorithms, including Prioritized Planning, MAPF-LNS2, and Priority Inheritance with Backtracking (PIBT). Experimental results show that using APF is not beneficial for MAPF but yields up to a 7-fold increase in overall system throughput for LMAPF.

MAPF focuses on planning collision-free paths for a group of agents. While state-of-the-art MAPF algorithms can plan paths for hundreds of robots in seconds, they often rely on simplified robot models, making their real-world performance unclear. Researchers typically lack access to hundreds of physical robots in laboratory settings to evaluate the algorithms. Meanwhile, industrial professionals who lack expertise in MAPF require an easy-to-use simulator to efficiently test and understand the performance of MAPF algorithms in their specific settings. SMART fills this gap with several advantages: (1) SMART uses a physics-engine-based simulator to create realistic simulation environments, accounting for complex real-world factors such as robot kinodynamics and execution uncertainties, (2) SMART uses an execution monitor framework based on the Action Dependency Graph, facilitating seamless integration with various MAPF algorithms and robot models, and (3) SMART scales to thousands of robots. In addition, we use SMART to explore and demonstrate research questions about the execution of MAPF algorithms in real-world scenarios. The code is publicly available at https://jingtianyan.github.io/

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) increasingly collaborate in logistics, surveillance, inspection tasks and etc. However, existing simulators often focus on a single domain, limiting cross-domain study. This paper presents the SkyRover, a modular simulator for UAV-AGV multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF). SkyRover supports realistic agent dynamics, configurable 3D environments, and convenient APIs for external solvers and learning methods. By unifying ground and aerial operations, it facilitates cross-domain algorithm design, testing, and benchmarking. Experiments highlight SkyRover's capacity for efficient pathfinding and high-fidelity simulations in UAV-AGV coordination. Project is available at https://sites.google.com/view/mapf3d/home.

Solving the Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem optimally is known to be NP-Hard for both make-span and total arrival time minimization. While many algorithms have been developed to solve MAPF problems, there is no dominating optimal MAPF algorithm that works well in all types of problems and no standard guidelines for when to use which algorithm. In this work, we develop the deep convolutional network MAPFAST (Multi-Agent Path Finding Algorithm SelecTor), which takes a MAPF problem instance and attempts to select the fastest algorithm to use from a portfolio of algorithms. We improve the performance of our model by including single-agent shortest paths in the instance embedding given to our model and by utilizing supplemental loss functions in addition to a classification loss. We evaluate our model on a large and diverse dataset of MAPF instances, showing that it outperforms all individual algorithms in its portfolio as well as the state-of-the-art optimal MAPF algorithm selector. We also provide an analysis of algorithm behavior in our dataset to gain a deeper understanding of optimal MAPF algorithms' strengths and weaknesses to help other researchers leverage different heuristics in algorithm designs.

In this paper, we solve the classical Multi-agent Pathfinding (MAPF) problem. Existing approaches struggle to solve dense MAPF instances. In this paper, we propose a Corridor Generating Algorithm for MAPF, namely CGA-MAPF. In CGA-MAPF, the agents build \emph{corridors}, a set of connected vertices, from current locations towards agents' goals and evacuate other agents out of the corridors to avoid collisions and deadlocks. The proposed algorithm has a reachability property, i.e. every agent is guaranteed to reach its goal location at some point. In the experimental section, we demonstrate that CGA-MAPF outperforms baseline algorithms in terms of success rate across diverse MAPF benchmark grids, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

We use the Quality Diversity (QD) algorithm with Neural Cellular Automata (NCA) to generate benchmark maps for Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) algorithms. Previously, MAPF algorithms are tested using fixed, human-designed benchmark maps. However, such fixed benchmark maps have several problems. First, these maps may not cover all the potential failure scenarios for the algorithms. Second, when comparing different algorithms, fixed benchmark maps may introduce bias leading to unfair comparisons between algorithms. In this work, we take advantage of the QD algorithm and NCA with different objectives and diversity measures to generate maps with patterns to comprehensively understand the performance of MAPF algorithms and be able to make fair comparisons between two MAPF algorithms to provide further information on the selection between two algorithms. Empirically, we employ this technique to generate diverse benchmark maps to evaluate and compare the behavior of different types of MAPF algorithms such as bounded-suboptimal algorithms, suboptimal algorithms, and reinforcement-learning-based algorithms. Through both single-planner experiments and comparisons between algorithms, we identify patterns where each algorithm excels and detect disparities in runtime or success rates between different algorithms.

Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is the problem of finding paths for multiple agents such that they do not collide. This problem manifests in numerous real-world applications such as controlling transportation robots in automated warehouses, moving characters in video games, and coordinating self-driving cars in intersections. Finding optimal solutions to MAPF is NP-Hard, yet modern optimal solvers can scale to hundreds of agents and even thousands in some cases. Different solvers employ different approaches, and there is no single state-of-the-art approach for all problems. Furthermore, there are no clear, provable, guidelines for choosing when each optimal MAPF solver to use. Prior work employed Algorithm Selection (AS) techniques to learn such guidelines from past data. A major challenge when employing AS for choosing an optimal MAPF algorithm is how to encode the given MAPF problem. Prior work either used hand-crafted features or an image representation of the problem. We explore graph-based encodings of the MAPF problem and show how they can be used on-the-fly with a modern graph embedding algorithm called FEATHER. Then, we show how this encoding can be effectively joined with existing encodings, resulting in a novel AS method we call MAPF Algorithm selection via Graph embedding (MAG). An extensive experimental evaluation of MAG on several MAPF algorithm selection tasks reveals that it is either on-par or significantly better than existing methods.

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a critical component of logistics and warehouse management, which focuses on planning collision-free paths for a team of robots in a known environment. Recent work introduced a novel MAPF approach, LNS2, which proposed to repair a quickly-obtainable set of infeasible paths via iterative re-planning, by relying on a fast, yet lower-quality, priority-based planner. At the same time, there has been a recent push for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) based MAPF algorithms, which let agents learn decentralized policies that exhibit improved cooperation over such priority planning, although inevitably remaining slower. In this paper, we introduce a new MAPF algorithm, LNS2+RL, which combines the distinct yet complementary characteristics of LNS2 and MARL to effectively balance their individual limitations and get the best from both worlds. During early iterations, LNS2+RL relies on MARL for low-level re-planning, which we show eliminates collisions much more than a priority-based planner. There, our MARL-based planner allows agents to reason about past and future/predicted information to gradually learn cooperative decision-making through a finely designed curriculum learning. At later stages of planning, LNS2+RL adaptively switches to priority-based planning to quickly resolve the remaining collisions, naturally trading-off solution quality and computational efficiency. Our comprehensive experiments on challenging tasks across various team sizes, world sizes, and map structures consistently demonstrate the superior performance of LNS2+RL compared to many MAPF algorithms, including LNS2, LaCAM, and EECBS. In maps with complex structures, the advantages of LNS2+RL are particularly pronounced, with LNS2+RL achieving a success rate of over 50% in nearly half of the tested tasks, while that of LaCAM and EECBS falls to 0%.

We study how to use guidance to improve the throughput of lifelong Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF). Previous studies have demonstrated that while incorporating guidance, such as highways, can accelerate MAPF algorithms, this often results in a trade-off with solution quality. In addition, how to generate good guidance automatically remains largely unexplored, with current methods falling short of surpassing manually designed ones. In this work, we introduce the directed guidance graph as a versatile representation of guidance for lifelong MAPF, framing Guidance Graph Optimization (GGO) as the task of optimizing its edge weights. We present two GGO algorithms to automatically generate guidance for arbitrary lifelong MAPF algorithms and maps. The first method directly solves GGO by employing CMA-ES, a black-box optimization algorithm. The second method, PIU, optimizes an update model capable of generating guidance, demonstrating the ability to transfer optimized guidance graphs to larger maps with similar layouts. Empirically, we show that (1) our guidance graphs improve the throughput of three representative lifelong MAPF algorithms in four benchmark maps, and (2) our update model can generate guidance graphs for as large as $93 \times 91$ maps and as many as 3000 agents.